Why Rolex refuses to pay for product placement even in James Bond movies

That's really charitable of you too in the Bond franchise there.

2:11:43 / 2:12:23

and they chose Omega for that one. Oh, wow. Wow. That's really charitable of you too in the Bond franchise there. No. It is. No. Come on. Omega paid them a boatload of money for product placement. They did eventually, but initially, it was not a paid placement.

Really? Uh-huh. I was almost certain that '95 was when they decided to bid out all the stuff. Well, let's put it this way. If it was bid out, Rolex would decline to bid because Rolex does not engage in

paid product placement. Well, that's why I assumed the only way that Bond would stop wearing Rolex. I mean, I guess maybe you could make an argument that you're trying to reboot the franchise around Pierce Brosnan. Pierce Brosnan

About this clip

The hosts discuss how James Bond switched from Rolex to Omega watches, revealing that Rolex has a strict policy against paid product placement. They debate whether the initial Omega placement in GoldenEye was paid or organic, with one host arguing that Rolex's refusal to bid on product placements explains why Bond stopped wearing their watches.

Why this clip

This reveals a fascinating contrast in luxury brand marketing strategies and explains a notable shift in one of cinema's most iconic franchises.

2:11:43 - 2:12:2341smarket insight

Share

LinkedInX

What they said next

Before quartz nearly killed Rolex, this forgotten technology almost disrupted watchmaking

2:49:07 - 36s · market insight

More from this episode

Similar clips from other shows

From the blog

Want clips like this for your podcast?

We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.

Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free