Why Rolex tests dive watches 25% beyond their advertised depth rating

Most of them, I think, are a 10% extra margin of safety, but I think the dive watches are an extra 25%.

2:08:00 / 2:08:34

actually testing their watches to significantly greater depth than what is advertised for this reason. That's correct.

Most of them, I think, are a 10% extra margin of safety, but I think the dive watches are an extra 25%.

Yeah. You don't wanna be like, oh, I've got a 300 meter depth watch and, get down to 300 meters and think you're good, but actually go to three zero five. Yep. You know, a 100 meter

waterproof watch is nice even just for going in swimming pools, and I'm not sure I would want a 10 meter waterproof watch. It feels dangerous.

Yep. But it's not really about the waterproofness.

About this clip

Ben and David break down Rolex's safety margins for waterproof watches, explaining why dive watches are tested to 25% greater depth than advertised while other watches get a 10% buffer. They discuss practical implications for swimmers and divers, though hint that waterproofness isn't the real story behind Rolex's success.

Why this clip

This reveals specific insider knowledge about how luxury watchmakers actually test their products beyond marketing claims, providing practical value for watch buyers.

2:08:00 - 2:08:3434stactical advice

Share

LinkedInX

What they said next

Why Rolex only sponsors the Masters, not the entire PGA Tour

2:24:30 - 37s · market insight

More from this episode

From the blog

Want clips like this for your podcast?

We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.

Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free