Why venture capital needs MORE money, not less, despite crazy valuations
“But, Ned, when I take a step back, I always ask myself fundamental question.”
because that's how we enter technology into a much bigger town. So in some way, do I think there is too much money? Yeah. Do I think there's some stupid valuation? Yeah. For sure. But, Ned, when I take a step back, I always ask myself fundamental question. Do I believe the world's going to have more technology or less? And if I believe the answer is more in this very very of industries, we need to see more capital coming to a venture.
There there was a time and you you remember, this is maybe fifteen years ago where people said venture can only support funds raising $4,050,000,000,000
About this clip
A VC argues that despite acknowledging excessive money and inflated valuations in venture capital, the fundamental question remains whether the world will have more or less technology. Given the answer is clearly more, across many industries, venture capital actually needs to see more capital inflow, not less.
Why this clip
This presents a counterintuitive argument that challenges the common narrative about too much money in VC by reframing it around inevitable technology expansion.
What they said next
VCs discuss how $500B+ companies are changing early stage investing forever
27:50 - 36s · market insight
More from this episode
Similar clips from other shows
From the blog
Want clips like this for your podcast?
We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.
Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free