I was in a meeting yesterday where someone said they're starting to see their AI generated ads outperform their human produced ads. By the way, it could save you time.
“I was in a meeting yesterday where someone said, and I'm waiting for the data to back this up, that they're starting to see their AI generated ads outperform their human produced ads.”
because we have been the Pied Piper for twenty years that this is the real game. I was in a meeting yesterday
where someone said, and I'm waiting for the data to back this up, that they're starting to see their AI generated ads outperform
their human produced ads. By the way, it could save you time. That is true. Okay. What are you seeing? I I see that both can work. Meaning, a a the AI ads that perform will be cheaper than the human based. Well, and and on you can create they're not even ads or pieces of content. You can create hundreds Here's how it's gonna play out. For the next three to five years, the big companies aren't gonna do it because we keep yelling at them. Because we're all scared we're gonna lose our jobs, so we're just mad at AI. So the big companies are not gonna be able to do a By the way, there should be AI Super Bowl ads this Super Bowl. Why why aren't there? Because they'll get murdered. Why? Everybody. Because humans in society are scared about AI, so they shame brands and say, I'm not gonna buy your stuff, and brands don't wanna lose market share. But it's called stigma. Do you remember online dating in 02/2012?
Why this clip
Fresh data point about AI ad performance with cost implications. The casual delivery ('I was in a meeting yesterday') adds credibility while the performance claim is provocative enough to generate debate and shares.
More from this episode
From the blog
Want clips like this for your podcast?
We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.
Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free