Two things that make SaaS companies AI-proof in the automation wave
“Even in even SaaS tools are built for humans.”
so to speak.
What would you advise me? Like, things are built for humans. Like, otherwise, what's the point? Right? Even in even SaaS tools are built for humans. So for me, I think my question is, like, does this SaaS company own a relationship with a human on the other end of of things? And if it does, then I suspect it's it's not going away. You know? Or does the SaaS company own some, like, really important system of record? It's probably not going away. Maybe those both of those tough two things, the interaction with the human and the system of record are, like, more important than ever, actually. On the other hand, is the SaaS company, like, a kind of a glue layer, but it doesn't own either of those two things? Well, I'm not the expert here, but I'm more nervous about that kind of company.
About this clip
Alex Embiricos breaks down which SaaS companies will survive AI automation and which won't. He argues that companies owning human relationships or critical systems of record will thrive, while those serving as mere glue layers between systems face existential risk.
Why this clip
Provides a clear decision framework for evaluating which software companies will survive the AI automation wave based on two key factors.
What they said next
Inference is the new sales and marketing - PLG 2.0 is here
17:22 - 55s · prediction
More from this episode
Similar clips from other shows
From the blog
Want clips like this for your podcast?
We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.
Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free