Every investment I have to ask myself, is this company a likely beneficiary of AI or not? If the answer is that they're a victim of AI, obviously it's an easy answer. But even if the answer is neutral, still the answer is probably no.

And there's a lot of value being created, and there's a lot of value being destroyed, and there's a lot of value being shifted.

7:02 / 7:39

And there's a lot of value being created, and there's a lot of value being destroyed, and there's a lot of value being shifted. The the one thing maybe you could argue that change, I don't know if it's twenty four months or thirty six months, is that every investment I have to ask myself, is this company a likely beneficiary of AI or not? The answer is that they're a victim of AI. Obviously, it's an easy answer. But even if the answer is neutral, still the answer is probably no. So I just have to ask this question, which is a question I wouldn't ask four years ago. Right? Four years ago, I would look at an opportunity. I wouldn't ask myself, is this a beneficiary of AI? But in the past three years, absolutely, I have to, ask this question.

Why this clip

Provides a clear, actionable decision framework for AI-era investing. The binary thinking (beneficiary vs victim vs neutral = no) is memorable and addresses the biggest question facing VCs today with specific methodology.

7:02 - 7:3937sPractical Framework

Share

LinkedInX

What they said next

The compensation that the GP gets from the management fee is typically greater than the upside. Let's say you have $10 billion and you charge 2%. The minute you close the fund, you already made $200 million.

41:26 - 17s · Bold/Contrarian

More from this episode

From the blog

Want clips like this for your podcast?

We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.

Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free