Why 25% founder dilution is the red flag that kills deals
“Beyond that but and obviously, less is even better, but 25% to me is kinda like the cutoff.”
that's healthy. Beyond that but and obviously, less is even better, but 25% to me is kinda like the cutoff. After that, I started thinking about, like, why why is it so diluted?
Yeah. No. I mean, I would be wondering the same thing, but I guess what do you do about it? Right? Is there a way to actually clean it up? How do you go about remedying that situation?
It's very hard. A lot of investors will pass actually for that reason because it's difficult to have the conversation with telling people that you should own less of the business than you do. And so it is very difficult to unwind. There are some investors that, like, if they fall in love with a company and they just say, okay. We'll help you fix it. We'll talk to your other investors and explain to them that, you know, investing at, like, a $1,000,000 valuation was probably
About this clip
VC Yuri Sagalov explains why founder dilution above 25% becomes a major red flag for investors and why it's extremely difficult to fix once it happens. He discusses how some investors will pass entirely on over-diluted companies because unwinding bad cap table structures requires uncomfortable conversations about people owning less equity.
Why this clip
Provides a specific numerical threshold (25%) that founders can use to evaluate their cap table health and explains the real consequences of poor equity management.
More from this guest
Build Mode
2 appearances · 5 clips
What they said next
The harsh reality about startup employees risking everything for equity dreams
29:18 - 44s · contrarian take
More from this episode
Similar clips from other shows
From the blog
Want clips like this for your podcast?
We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.
Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free