Discover/Guest

Shishir Mehrotra

4 podcast appearances

Every podcast appearance by Shishir Mehrotra

Top clips

Key insights by topic

hiring

Short 30-minute interviews cannot provide better insight into how a person will work than feedback from people who have worked with them for five years.

||

Joining a large tech company should be viewed as a multi-year commitment because you won't truly understand how the organization operates in the first two to three years.

recommendationVillage Global Podcast3:00
||

Expecting to join a large tech company for just one year to build something cool and then leave is self-deception about how these organizations actually work.

||

Your investors often have recruitment firms that can be really helpful in the hiring process.

recommendationVillage Global Podcast3:34
||

Recruitment firms are most valuable when they can source candidates from pools that a startup cannot access on its own.

||

big tech

Google employees view startup employees as disorganized and inefficient, pointing out instances like multiple competing coffee shops in the same location that could be consolidated.

||

Startup employees perceive large tech company employees as mysterious and unclear about how they maintain their positions or what they actually do.

||

The way to stay employed and advance in large tech companies is to create organizational complexity or expand one's domain rather than optimize for efficiency.

||

When joining a larger company, employees develop company-specific skills that may not transfer to other organizations.

||

When you join a larger company, you learn a set of skills that are very company-specific and don't transfer to other organizations.

||

recruiting

Recruiting firms that source from pools you couldn't access yourself, such as dedicated college recruiters with boots on the ground at every institution, can be effective because they have unique sourcing capabilities.

||

Executive recruiters who have deep market knowledge and relationships can provide access to candidates you wouldn't otherwise know about or who weren't actively looking.

||

Hiring recruiting firms primarily to run your recruiting process for you is ineffective; companies need to own and operate their own recruiting process.

||

A world-class recruiting process requires mastering specific operational choices, such as how you run your feedback loops and make hiring decisions.

||

Recruiting is part of the product and should be treated with the same strategic importance as pricing and other core product decisions.

||

recruitment

Short 30-minute interviews cannot provide better insight into how a person will work than feedback from people who have worked with them for five years.

||

Your investors often have recruitment firms that can be really helpful in the hiring process.

recommendationVillage Global Podcast3:34
||

Recruitment firms are most valuable when they can source candidates from pools that a startup cannot access on its own.

||

Investor-affiliated recruitment firms can provide significant recruiting advantages, particularly for junior-level hiring through their established college recruiting networks.

||

Superhuman's primary investors, Greylock and General Catalyst, conducted college recruiting at scale by placing recruiters at every college campus, which the company could not replicate on its own.

||

startups

Google employees view startup employees as disorganized and inefficient, pointing out instances like multiple competing coffee shops in the same location that could be consolidated.

||

Startup employees perceive large tech company employees as mysterious and unclear about how they maintain their positions or what they actually do.

||

Joining a startup may be uncertain but provides highly transferable skills and experiences that are valuable for future roles, including starting your own company.

||

Joining a startup teaches a different set of transferable skills compared to big tech, including skills applicable to starting your own company.

||

Recruitment firms are most valuable when they can source candidates from pools that a startup cannot access on its own.

||

organizational structure

Large Silicon Valley companies operate with apparent disorganization that is actually quite efficient, similar to how the United States economy functions without central planning.

||

In large companies, employees move between projects organically rather than through top-down organizational decisions that shut down projects and reassign people.

||

At big tech companies, there is no central planner telling you your project is shutting down and reassigning your people; instead, people organically move between projects.

||

Benevolent dictatorships provide fast decision-making with clear decision-making lines as a primary advantage.

||

Large tech companies like Google operate through multiple sequential approval processes, similar to standing in multiple bread lines, where you eventually get a clear yes or no answer.

||

decision making

Deciding who the decision maker is on hiring is probably the most important choice a company makes in structuring its recruiting process.

||

Benevolent dictatorships provide fast decision-making with clear decision-making lines as a primary advantage.

||

Large tech companies like Google operate through multiple sequential approval processes, similar to standing in multiple bread lines, where you eventually get a clear yes or no answer.

||

Google employees view Silicon Valley startups as chaotic and uncoordinated, whereas startup founders view Google as bureaucratic and slow.

||

Running an effective recruiting process requires understanding how to run your own decision-making loops and what a world-class recruiting process looks like when you own and operate it yourself.

||

organizational culture

Google employees view startup employees as disorganized and inefficient, pointing out instances like multiple competing coffee shops in the same location that could be consolidated.

||

Startup employees perceive large tech company employees as mysterious and unclear about how they maintain their positions or what they actually do.

||

Google employees view Silicon Valley startups as chaotic and uncoordinated, whereas startup founders view Google as bureaucratic and slow.

||

Google employees perceive Silicon Valley startups as chaotic and inefficient, with conflicting priorities such as multiple competing initiatives in the same area.

||

Startup employees perceive Google as a slow bureaucracy where decisions take excessive time to execute.

||

Episodes