You've made all private property public property because the government is simply giving you permission every year to keep your stuff.
“But the general population should be very much aware of the fact that as soon as you give a legislature the ability to discriminate a group and take whatever person that they want.”
And we can harp all day long about eat the rich and, obviously, this group is is biased. But the general population should be very much aware of the fact that as soon as you give a legislature the ability to discriminate a group and take whatever person that they want. Precedent. Yeah. You've set and and it's over. You've you're now down now what you've done is you've made all private property public property because the government is simply giving you permission every year to keep your stuff. And the government shouldn't even know. It's like they're they're coming on to your ranch and calculating how many tractors you got, how you got an old Corvette, how much is that worth, what's what's your old roadster worth, what's your grandpa jewelry worth, how much moose is moose? Moose is, yeah. They're gonna take 5% of moose. Very valuable thoroughbred there. Absolutely.
Why this clip
This reframes wealth taxes as fundamental property rights violation with stark 'permission to keep your stuff' language. The slippery slope argument resonates strongly with constitutional concerns.
What they said next
The key question that everyone's asking is Trump gonna act in supporting the revolution, which would involve attacking IRGC sites, which are the revolutionary guard that maintains the regime's control over the people.
8:21 - 32s · Consequences
More from this episode
From the blog
Want clips like this for your podcast?
We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.
Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free