A lot of the sources from pollution, I believe that's in the seventies percents, is coming from where we work and where we live. It's really good to clean up the oceans, but it's actually not really smart to continue to keep clean up the oceans. It's better to not pollute the oceans.
“a lot of the the the sources from pollution, I believe also that's that's in the seventies percents, is coming from where we work and where we live.”
Find this show
a lot of the the the sources from pollution, I believe also that's that's in the seventies percents, is coming from where we work and where we live. So we need to have a systems change. So it's it's really good to clean up the oceans, but it's actually not really smart to continue to keep clean up the oceans. It's better to not pollute the oceans. And that's more or less we are looking at the source of the pollution and their work. That's where we then want to create the changes. That's a bit how our
Why this clip
Challenges the conventional wisdom of ocean cleanup efforts with a contrarian take that prevention is better than cure. The specific statistic (70%) and the provocative framing make it highly quotable.
What they said next
If you look at radiology and if you have cancer, but the cancer is like a year earlier or half a year earlier detected by AI than it would have been by the surgeon, your recovery time is so much better. You get less sick. You will be able to go back to work earlier.
15:08 - 29s · Business Mechanics
More from this episode
From the blog
Want clips like this for your podcast?
We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.
Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free