US government vs Anthropic: VCs debate AI regulation priorities
“And so I'm afraid I'd I'd actually, much as I admire and love Anthropic as a company, I'd I'd I'm not with them on this one.”
Find this show
you you wanna you wanna win those contracts. The US government, as the customer, is gonna do what it needs to do to protect its people. And so I'm afraid I'd I'd actually, much as I admire and love Anthropic as a company, I'd I'd I'm not with them on this one.
Yep. I think I think that's fair. I I I it's just that if you obviously, we've all got young children and just thinking what kind of a what kind of a world are we bringing them into and technology and AI and how do all these bits connect? But, again, we will see. I also saw that OpenAI have hired Peter Steinberger.
He had he had a he had a pop at the EU. Lomax, did you have any thoughts on this? Well, I don't have any thoughts because I, you know, I I do do my fair bit of, like, EU and UK bashing particularly when it comes comes to technology and and investment. But he's Peter Steinberg has not not not held back at all. Right? So, you know, the famously behind OpenClaw
About this clip
VCs discuss their disagreement with Anthropic's stance on government AI regulations, arguing the US government must prioritize protecting its citizens. The conversation touches on concerns about the world being created for future generations and includes mention of OpenAI's Peter Steinberger criticizing EU tech policy.
Why this clip
The speakers take a clear contrarian position against a major AI company's regulatory stance, creating debate-worthy content about government priorities versus tech company preferences.
More from this episode
Similar clips from other shows
From the blog
Want clips like this for your podcast?
We find your top 5-8 clips, write the hooks, and deliver ready-to-post content. First 2 episodes are free.
Get 2 Episodes Clipped Free