Searching...
13 results for “inflection points”
Do you do military intervention? That's a nice case. Maybe you have a better case study, but that's such an extreme one Yeah. That it's interesting. Are we talking about Germany or Japan? Germany side. Yeah. So so Japan attacked us. And Germany decla
3:42:59 / 3:44:33
from transcript3:42:59 – 3:44:33
And when people were starting to write these sort of major narratives in the nineteen seventies and eighties and into the nineteen nineties is through a prism of a very, very different world. And so one of the reasons why you have this narrative that
1:35:53 / 1:37:01
from transcript1:35:53 – 1:37:01
Number two, we'd have open flows of trade and capital, so basically the unfettered free trade agenda. And then number three, the third leg of it was Pax Americano. We'd deploy American troops all over the world to defend this consensus because they'd
1:23:54 / 1:25:02
from transcript1:23:54 – 1:25:02
which why stop 30% short of ninety percent two thirty five? It's because they're not even making a threat. They're built they're making, like, the most latent of threat. It's a bargaining chip to negotiate a way. They're trying to put pressure on The
47:13 / 48:22
from transcript47:13 – 48:22
Real wages haven't really gone up for, like, forty years. So you've got a lot of problems. You can identify that through income inequality, you can talk about that this and that way. So why is this important? It's important because it means that goin
18:02 / 19:04
from transcript18:02 – 19:04
On the other hand, they're telling companies what their margins should be and what their prices should be, and what policies they should pursue internally, whether culturally or otherwise. So is the Republican Party a deregulating party? Well, the an
15:44 / 16:53
from transcript15:44 – 16:53
because he realizes that a stable Iran is a stable Middle East. So I think it's really amazing. And then the fact that he was able to bring Israel and Iran, who's been on the verge of some kind of conflict for decades and broker a ceasefire, it's a r
17:05 / 18:15
from transcript17:05 – 18:15
that even though the mainstream media and Fox News was basically acting like this was 2003, you had alternative media. And you had people like Tucker Carlson speaking out and Steve Bannon, and I have to give him credit on this, and others who are who
29:04 / 30:18
from transcript29:04 – 30:18
And then you have financial constraints. Bond yields go up. The bond market, super powerful. And then we have constitutional and legal constraints, and finally, geopolitical constraints as well. So that's I would say there's five buckets. Not all of
17:15 / 18:29
from transcript17:15 – 18:29
but the ones talking about in the book, that is. And so they can be thought about as acting over, say, five to ten year time frame. And, of course, anything that involves a conversation on demographics, occasionally, they'll just kinda close their ea
8:13 / 9:22
from transcript8:13 – 9:22
Then, of course, you have the trade, and I'm gonna just concede to James and Louis on that front. I just wanted to start off with something unsexy and it's not really talked about. It's the fiscal gravy trade that gave us exceptionalism of The US ass
9:47 / 10:49
from transcript9:47 – 10:49
You've heard, obviously, the president has his position. We're not doing regime change. It's a secondary effect, obviously, but we wanna stop those ICBMs and nuclear bombs from being developed, and we wanna stop terrorism. Additionally, Freeburg says
8:13 / 9:16
from transcript8:13 – 9:16
I think, legitimately, that statement, removing the trolling from it, is the revisionist history statement that I think is wrong. The invasion of the Soviet Union would have happened no matter what, and possibly, which I'm actually learning a lot mor
1:36:00 / 1:37:00
from transcript1:36:00 – 1:37:00
Have a podcast?
Run your podcast through Clypt
Get ranked clips, hooks, and ready-to-post copy from your own episodes. Free to try.