Searching...
18 results for “gdp analysis”
Product3 mentions across episodes
GDP
...about GDP is people don't realize what we do is we use the census. So there's business census calling around to companies, and it's not really calling around anymore, it's more economic connection to companies through APIs and otherwise, and one of t
10:29 / 11:36
from transcript10:29 – 11:36
...4% GDP growth. I said it in the first quarter. Yeah. And 4.3. Now, the fourth quarter is gonna be, a mess because of the shutdown. Seriously, this is accounting in America. If someone works for the government, they count them as GDP. And you would sa
1:04:28 / 1:05:31
from transcript1:04:28 – 1:05:31
...now, it's turned down pretty significantly. And a lot of people, Kevin Hassett and others, have pointed out kind of the one time issues that are impacting this around net exports. But let's just suffice it to say, that that that's going down. And the
5:59 / 7:01
from transcript5:59 – 7:01
...GDP is gonna grow. We don't know the economic benefit and effects of AI. We don't know the economic benefits and effects of the work that's being done to deregulate. Another key point, which is not talked about by Navarro or anywhere else, there's a
1:09:37 / 1:10:46
from transcript1:09:37 – 1:10:46
...so GDP growth is a function of the number of people working times productivity. It's very simple. Economists wanna make it more complex than that, but it's the number of people working times productivity. If you go if productivity goes up to five, si
1:17:57 / 1:19:03
from transcript1:17:57 – 1:19:03
...GDP is nonproductive government spending? How about we do one thing? Yeah. GDP. D means domestic, P is product, domestic production. It's not consumption. Right. If I go out and buy a Toyota. Right. Right? That's not GDP. Right? If I buy a Chevy that
44:59 / 46:03
from transcript44:59 – 46:03
...The GDP boomed in, you know, 3%, which is pretty great. But is that problem no. The problem that Jerome Powell has is that he's trying to smooth it because it allows him to justify his political decision.
1:04:23 / 1:05:30
from transcript1:04:23 – 1:05:30
...GDP print, and then maybe you could get into the granular details of that print. If you pull up the schedule of data, so this is the national income and product accounts data from the Bureau of Economic Analysis. So this is where the inflation print
1:08:15 / 1:09:16
from transcript1:08:15 – 1:09:16
...of GDP to represent people exchanging money for goods and services. People, like, basically, exchanging their labor for goods exchanging the value of their labor for goods and services. That's at a fundamental level, that's what GDP is. We're envisio
19:31 / 20:31
from transcript19:31 – 20:31
...So so GDP growth is a function of the number of people working times productivity. It's very simple. Economists wanna make it more complex than that, but it's the number of people working times productivity. If you go if productivity goes up to five,
1:18:37 / 1:19:46
from transcript1:18:37 – 1:19:46
...Oh, GDP. For economic analysis. Well, that's why I get to talk about GDP and how I'm gonna clean up the nonsense that isn't GDP. You know, I can explain that if you make a tank and someone buys a tank, that is GDP. Yeah. But a thousand people thinkin
44:09 / 45:16
from transcript44:09 – 45:16
...GDP. It had used those tools to then measure and estimate the value of things like ecosystem services and pollution damages and natural resources. And what this paper shows is that prior to the process of urbanization and firewood sort of entering ma
39:00 / 40:01
from transcript39:00 – 40:01
...once the war was over. But the general trend since 1700 to now is up and to the right. And the key observation is that it moves in unison, that these things are relative problems. So if the entire world moves in unison like this, there is an argument
43:26 / 44:30
from transcript43:26 – 44:30
...this GDP growth, rather than from investment or infrastructure, then I think that it might focus the government's objective a bit more on, thinking about how to make people feel more secure, so that they wanna save more. For instance, creating more j
31:20 / 32:30
from transcript31:20 – 32:30
...GDP once the war was over. But the general trend since 1700 to now is up and to the right. And the key observation is that it moves in unison, that these things are relative problems. So if the entire world
42:45 / 43:45
from transcript42:45 – 43:45
...GDP. Why don't you assume 2.2 or why don't you assume 2.7? Or any number? Or really what he's saying is why don't you build a sensitivity so that you can see the implications of that? And I think that that is a very important point. Okay. So where do
1:02:15 / 1:03:17
from transcript1:02:15 – 1:03:17
...GDP. Okay. This is the leading GDP prediction model from the Atlanta Fed. Could be as high as 3.8%. Again, this is a prediction for q two. Q two is obviously not over, but this would be a pretty big jump over q one. Despite all this positive data, th
46:28 / 47:32
from transcript46:28 – 47:32
Have a podcast?
Run your podcast through Clypt
Get ranked clips, hooks, and ready-to-post copy from your own episodes. Free to try.