And we can talk more about what the existing clocks are actually measuring, but they're not measuring biological age. They're correlated to something that's correlated to biological age. So it may be the wrong question. I think it's useful to talk ab

...is at enough resolution to know how to measure. There is no way to measure biological age. What you can do is estimate it a lot of different ways. I would suggest that what's more important is your current health status, and your quality of life than

...biology itself, what even is biology? Right? The best place to start is the cell, the fundamental building block of all of our biology and how our cells live and how our cells die. That determines whether you have good, healthy function and are worki

...the aging process is fundamentally different. But, b, there are congenital defects that mimic those, you know, gene mutations in humans, and you don't see the lifespan extension in those individuals. So why is it that quite a few of these interventio

We are aging constantly. So as you might know, biologists, clinicians, we don't have one definition of when aging really starts. But what you can see clinically is once you have reached your peak at the age of 18 to 25, every function you can measure

...on the biology of aging for a while, became obsessed with how could we get the first drug

...involved in the aging process. Like, woah. We are understanding biology. What we also do, we are manipulating biology, which is something which is coming out of the sea and it's called brown seaweed. So it's so advanced. And if you're looking back at